Preempt Blog

The latest insights and advice to keep your company protected from insider threats and breaches

Drop the MIC – CVE-2019-1040

As announced in our recent security advisory, Preempt researchers discovered how to bypass the MIC (Message Integrity Code) protection on NTLM authentication and modify any field in the NTLM message flow, including the signing requirement. This bypass allows attackers to relay authentication attempts which have negotiated signing to another server while entirely removing the signing requirement. All servers which do not enforce signing are vulnerable.

Background

NTLM relay is one of the most prevalent attacks on Active Directory environments. The most significant mitigation against this attack technique is server signing. However, by default, only domain controllers enforce SMB signing, which in many cases leaves other sensitive servers vulnerable. However, in order to compromise such a server, attackers would need to capture an NTLM negotiation which does not negotiate signing, which is the case in HTTP but not in SMB, where by default if both parties support signing, the session would necessarily be signed. In order to ensure that the NTLM negotiation stage is not tampered with by attackers, Microsoft added an additional field in the final NTLM authentication message – the MIC. However, we discovered that until Microsoft’s latest security patch, this field was useless, which enabled the most desired relay scenario of all – SMB to SMB relay.

Session Signing

When users authenticate to a target via NTLM, they may be vulnerable to relay attacks. In order to protect servers from such attacks, Microsoft has introduced various mitigations, the most significant of which is session signing. When users establish a signed session against a server, attackers cannot hijack the session due to their inability to retrieve the required session key. In SMB, session signing is negotiated by setting the ‘NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN’ flag in the NTLM_NEGOTIATE message. The client behavior is determined by several group policies (‘Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications’), for which the default configuration is to set the flag in question. If attackers attempt to relay such an NTLM authentication, they will need to ensure that signing is not negotiated. One way to do so is by relaying to protocols in which NTLM messages don’t govern the session integrity, such as LDAPS or HTTPS. However, these protocols are not open on every machine, as opposed to SMB which is enabled by default on all Windows machines and, in many cases, allows to remotely execute code. Consequently, the holy grail of NTLM relay attacks lies in relaying SMB authentication requests to other SMB servers. In order to successfully perform such NTLM relay, the attackers will need to modify the NTLM_NEGOTIATE message and unset the ‘NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN’ flag. However, in new NTLM versions there is a protection against such modifications – the MIC field.

 

The NTLM_NEGOTIATE message

Figure 1 – The NTLM_NEGOTIATE message dictates whether to negotiate SMB signing

MIC Overview

An NTLM authentication consists of 3 message types: NTLM_NEGOTIATE, NTLM_CHALLENGE, NTLM_AUTHENTICATE. To ensure that the messages were not manipulated in transit by a malicious actor, an additional MIC (Message Integrity Code) field has been added to the NTLM_AUTHENTICATE message. The MIC is an HMAC_MD5 applied to the concatenation of all 3 NTLM messages using the session key, which is known only to the account initiating the authentication and the target server. Hence, an attacker which tries to tamper with one of the messages (for example, modify the signing negotiation), would not be able to generate a corresponding MIC, which would cause the attack to fail.

MIC field protects from NTLM messages modification

Figure 2 – The ‘MIC’ field protects from NTLM messages modification

The presence of the MIC is announced in the ‘msvAvFlag’ field in the NTLM_AUTHENTICATE message (flag 0x2 indicates that the message includes a MIC) and it should fully protect servers from attackers which attempt to remove the MIC and perform NTLM relay. However, we found out that Microsoft servers do not take advantage of this protection mechanism and allow for unsigned (MIC-less) NTLM_AUTHENTICATE messages.

Flags field indicates that the NTLM_AUTHENTICATE message includes a MIC

Figure 3 – The ‘flags’ field indicating that the NTLM_AUTHENTICATE message includes a MIC

Drop The MIC

We discovered that all NTLM authentication requests are susceptible to relay attacks, no matter which protocol carries them. If the negotiation request includes a signing requirement, attackers would need to perform the following in order to overcome the protection of the MIC:

  • Unset the signing flags in the NTLM_NEGOTIATE message (NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_ALWAYS_SIGN, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN)
  • Remove the MIC from the NTLM_AUTHENTICATE message
  • Remove the version field from the NTLM_AUTHENTICATE message (removing the MIC field without removing the version field would result in an error).
  • Unset the following flags in the NTLM_AUTHENTICATE message: NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_ALWAYS_SIGN, NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN, NEGOTIATE_KEY_EXCHANGE, NEGOTIATE_VERSION.

We believe that this is a serious attack vector which breaks the misconception that the MIC protects an NTLM authentication in any way. We believe that the issue lies in the fact that the target server which accepts an authentication with an ‘msvAvFlag’ value indicating that the authentication carries a MIC, does not in fact verify the presence of this field. This leaves all servers which do not enforce server signing (which in most organizations means the vast majority of servers since by default only domain controllers enforce SMB signing) vulnerable to NTLM relay attacks.

This attack does not only allow attackers to overcome the session signing negotiation, but also leaves the organization vulnerable to much more complicated relay attacks which manipulate the NTLM messages in transit to overcome various security setting such as EPA (Enhanced Protection for Authentication). For more details on this attack refer to the following blog

In order to truly protect your servers from NTLM relay attacks, enforce signing on all your servers. If such a configuration is too strict for your environment, try to configure this setting on as many of your sensitive servers.

Microsoft has release the following fix: https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-1040 

How Preempt can Help

Preempt constantly works to protect its customers. Customers who have deployed Preempt have been consistently protected from NTLM relay attacks. The Preempt Platform provides full network NTLM visibility, allowing you to reduce NTLM traffic and analyze suspicious NTLM activity. In addition, Preempt has innovative industry-first deterministic NTLM relay detection capabilities and has the ability to inspect all GPO configurations and will alert on insecure configurations.

For non-Preempt customers, this configuration inspection is also available in Preempt Lite, a free lightweight version of the Preempt Platform. You can download Preempt Lite here and verify which areas of your network are vulnerable.

Topics: Microsoft, NTLM, Security Advisory,

Product

Brute Force Attacks: Denying the Attacker, Not the User

According tohaveIbeenpwned.com, close to 8 billion accounts have been compromised...

Read More

Developer

What State-Sponsored Attacks Can Teach Us About Conditional Access

People often think that state-sponsored attacks from groups like Lazarus...

Read More

Events

A Simplified Approach to Network Segmentation

Network segmentation has long been one of the most valuable tools for protecting ...

Read More

Research

10 Things You Need to Know About Kerberos

As our research team continues to find vulnerabilities in Microsoft that bypass all major

Read More

Product

Brute Force Attacks: Denying the Attacker, Not the User

According tohaveIbeenpwned.com, close to 8 billion accounts have been compromised...

Read More